Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable and the rest are good at writing code that runs. They're not trained to think about who shouldn't see your database, or what happens when a contact form gets spammed. We review what the AI actually built, fix what it missed, and keep watching afterward — so the site that shipped in an afternoon doesn't become the breach that costs a weekend.
We check the specific things AI-generated code is most likely to miss: missing permission checks, open REST endpoints, unescaped output, and hardcoded credentials — the exact gaps researchers keep finding in AI-written code.
91% of 2025's disclosed WordPress vulnerabilities were in plugins, and AI tools reach for new ones constantly while building. We audit what's installed, remove what's unnecessary, and patch what's left.
New gaps show up as traffic and features grow, not just at launch. We monitor for unusual activity, broken forms, and failed checkouts, and fix what we find — not just what you happen to notice.
wp-admin and hosting/FTP access — we review the actual site that got built, not a description of it.
Specific issues found in your specific install — missing permission checks, exposed endpoints, outdated plugins — within 48 hours, free.
Issues get patched, then monitored going forward on the ongoing plan — updates, backups, and security checks, every month.
Covers updates, backups, security monitoring, and a set amount of fix time each month. The first review — where we find what the AI missed — is free either way.
Request a scopeNo — any WordPress site benefits, but AI-built and AI-edited sites get a dedicated first review, since that's reliably where we find the most missed security and permission issues.
Missing permission checks, open REST endpoints with no access control, unescaped output, hardcoded credentials, outdated or conflicting plugins, and whether backups actually exist and restore. Specific to your install, not a generic scanner report.
No — that's exactly who this is for. You don't need to understand the findings yourself; you get a plain-English report and we handle the fix.
Not even slightly — it's the fastest way to get something live, and we use AI tools ourselves. The gap isn't the AI; it's that nobody reviewed what it shipped. That review is the part we do.
Then the first review confirms that in writing and you've lost nothing — plenty of sites pass. Most don't, which is exactly why the review is free rather than something you pay to find out.
Fill in the form and we’ll tell you plainly what fixing it involves — scope, price, and timeline, in writing.
WP Please
Legacy systems, cloud cost and AI work for businesses that can't afford downtime.
