Not every legacy problem fits neatly under "PHP" or ".NET" — old VB6 desktop apps, unsupported Java, on-premise software nobody wants to touch, or a system so old the original vendor no longer exists. This is the catch-all for exactly that: get it assessed, then modernised incrementally, whatever the original stack is.

We start by figuring out what it actually runs on and what it actually does — often two different things from what the documentation (if any) claims.
The same route-by-route migration approach we use for PHP and .NET applies here too — the old system stays live as a fallback throughout.
Sometimes the right answer is a wrapper API in front of the old system, not replacing it at all — we tell you honestly which applies.
Even "nobody remembers exactly how this works" is a fine starting point.
What it actually does, what depends on it, and the realistic options — rewrite, wrap, or leave alone.
Fixed-price where the scope allows it, staged so nothing goes dark mid-migration.
Legacy systems vary too much to price off a rate card — the assessment itself is fixed-price and comes first.
Request a scopeAnything running on a stack, framework, or vendor platform that's aged out of support or common knowledge — VB6, old on-prem Java, discontinued vendor software, and similar.
That's common, not unusual — reverse-engineering an undocumented legacy system from its actual behaviour is part of the assessment.
No — sometimes wrapping the old system in a modern API, or a targeted partial migration, is the honestly better and cheaper answer.
Those are for specifically PHP or .NET systems, where we already know the exact migration path. This page is for everything else.
Fill in the form and we’ll tell you plainly what fixing it involves — scope, price, and timeline, in writing.