Cost and security are two different reviews of the same cloud account, and most teams have only ever had the cost one done. Misconfigured storage permissions, over-broad IAM roles, and unpatched managed services are common findings on accounts that have never had a dedicated security review — regardless of which of the three major clouds they're on.

Over-permissioned roles, unused credentials, and missing MFA — the findings that show up in almost every first audit.
Storage buckets, databases, and management consoles checked for accidental public access — the single most common real-world breach cause.
Ranked by actual risk, not a 40-page scanner dump — what to fix first, and why.
A scoped, read-only role — we never need write or admin access to audit an account.
The same baseline controls AWS, Azure and GCP each publish and get audited against professionally.
A written report either way, and a fixed price if you want us to fix what we find.
Typical range for a single-account audit across AWS, Azure or GCP. Multi-account or multi-cloud environments quoted per scope.
Request a scopeNo — that's billing waste; this is security exposure. Same account, two different reviews. Ask about both together and we'll usually do them for less than the sum of each separately.
No — we audit AWS, Azure and GCP, and a growing number of teams run more than one, so a multi-cloud review is common, not an edge case.
You get the written report regardless. If you want us to fix what we found, that's quoted separately and fixed-price, never open-ended.
No — the audit itself is entirely read-only and has zero effect on running systems.
Fill in the form and we’ll tell you plainly what fixing it involves — scope, price, and timeline, in writing.